online dorks when they see kids enjoying something they don’t like:
Y’all got problems acting like you’ve never done anything considered cringe in your youths
This is now “cringy stuff you did in your youth” thread
I lied about discovering secret areas and secret characters in popular games that don’didn’t even exist to brag about them to what few friends I had. I even made up movies and games wholesale for no reason whatsoever.
One time when I was swinging at a park I faked being Japanese to keep these kids away from me. In my weird faked Japanese accent I told them favorite food was “oh knees Gary.” Looking back it makes me want to like… Remove my brain and snip whatever gotdamn neuron is making me remember stuff at 10 pm when I’m trying to sleep
When I was in middle school and my cousin was in college we used to tell self-insert Inuyasha fanfiction where Kagome died and I turned out to be her reincarnation to stop a new enemy that was stronger than Naraku. We even brought my parents, my schoolmates, her family, all those people into the story and they each played various roles, usually as antagonists against mine and Inuyasha’s TWU WUB.
I use the word tell instead of write because they were basically told orally, and I used to get up early every weekend so we could continue the story. Oh, and my cousin lived in America, so we used to hog the vonage phone for hours, the vonage phone my father needed to deal with American clients.
Yeah, my dad wasn’t happy about that. And imagine explaining “my daughter and her cousin were telling anime self-insert fanfiction” as an excuse for not calling your boss.
the only thing that “lessens the impact” of the word pedophile is people normalizing pedophilic content thats used to groom children on the regular. sexual content involving minors is NEVER ok, regardless of whether or not its fictional.
No, what lessens the impact of the word pedophilia is people using the word pedophilia to mean anything but the attraction to children and young teens who are unable to consent.
Pedophilia is not an 18 year old having a relationship with a 17 year old, or a 22 year old in a relationship with a 36 year old. Those relationships have the possibility to be abusive, sure, but they are not pedophilia.
If someone sees a post on Tumblr that warns that someone is a pedophile, they should be able to trust that it is a post warning that the person in question has had inappropriate contact with a child or young teen who cannot consent. Not having doubt about whether it means ‘this person wrote or drew a fictional depiction of abuse, which isn’t pedophilia or child pornography, but they’re not themselves attracted to children.’ That doubt is what makes being on Tumblr unsafe for minors, and you and people who support the idea in this post are contributing to that.
The way some women on here talk about other women reminds me of how reddit users who unironically call other people chads and normies talk about women.
Nothing seems to make people angrier than women who freely choose who they will and won’t have sex with and it would be hilarious if it wasn’t so damn creepy.
What makes this even more hilarious is this post could be about incels, transtrenders, TERFs, or political lesbians.
Okay. Forget abuse. What about situations where the mother, while not abusive, isn’t fit to be a parent for whatever reason? Be it drug addiction, mental illness, just incompetency in general, whatever.
What about sons? There are certain things that mothers can’t teach them. After a certain age, they will need their fathers to help them how to navigate issues like male puberty, male sexuality, male intimate hygiene, and such.
Or just maybe, there are things the mother cannot do or doesn’t know, which the father compensates for, and thus the child is raised better because they can get the good from BOTH parents.
How about instead of assigning parenthood based on biology, we assign parenthood based on the child’s needs and the family situation? And most importantly based on merit?
If we want to talk about responsibility we must stop talking about violence against women in a passive way.
Because one thing is to ask “ how many women are killed by men every year “ and another is to ask “ how many men kill women every year “.
Can you see the difference?
The subject of the sentence is important.
Let’s stop putting the woman asasubject because it leads to phraseslike: “ yes, but she’d been drinking? How was she dressed? “
Begin to put men as the subject “ How did he act? How did he take advantage of her? How did he kill her? “
Disclaimer: this is not the right post to argue with phrases like NOT ALL MEN or WHAT ABOUT WOMEN WHO BEAT MEN? Not because they don’t have sense in general, but because right now we are not talking about that.
This sounds like a very informal and non friendly to debate. Assault and rape is terrible sure, but I think talking about it should be more informational then biased.
How is it not informational? How is it more biased than the other way around? Considering that men commit 97% of sexual assaults with women as the majority victims of their crimes why the hell should this be a “friendly” debate?
Rape (revised definition): Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim. (This includes the offenses of rape, sodomy, and sexual assault with an object as converted from data submitted via the National Incident-Based Reporting System.)
Oh look, the FBI chose a definition which specifically excludes the main ways in which women can rape people.
Your 97.1% gender split is meaningless without, say, rape by envelopment data, or forced oral sex of the other kind that the FBI doesn’t mention.
Ah yes I keep hearing about this supposed epidemic of female rapists that would totally make the sex crime statistics the 50/50 split “egalitarians” so dearly wish they could argue so they can go on pretending that women aren’t oppressed as a sex and class.
I’m sure you have studies and data on this. You know, burden of proof, innocent until proven guilty, all those things that matter so much until MRAs want to deny reality.
Notice how the men who were raped outnumber the number of women who were raped over a 12 month period, and the number of men who were specifically raped by being made to penetrate still somewhat outnumber the women who were raped.
Elsewhere, some of the other numbers suggest parity between the sexes. Some definitely do not. But none of them come anywhere close to suggesting a 97% gender imbalance for perpetrators.
That’s what happens when you consider all kinds of rape.
I like how wanda claims she’s seen the argument before, but has somehow never seen evidence. Ironic how she harps on evidence, >considering some< >of the silly< >and incorrect< >arguments she’s made<. Notice the last one; she was once more concerned about the idea that Indian rape laws might be referred to with a different term than the fact that men aren’t recognized as rape victims, period.
I also like how her response delicatetacostudent-blog’s criticism was to immediately try and play Oppression Olympics, even though the point she made is actually completely irrelevant to the question of the pic’s persuasiveness. Wanda thinks women have a Universal Victim License.
Five bucks says she claims MTP is somehow different from rape, either by making up an excuse on the spot, or quoting that FOIA letter from the CDC where they said Made to Penetrate isn’t rape because it just isn’t, okay?
As for OP; feminism already has a problem with the stereotype of collectively blaming men for everything – a stereotype which makes many women reject feminism – and you think doing precisely that is a good idea? Why? How?
What exactly is your goal, here? Do you want people to listen, or do you just want to blame men? And who exactly is using passive language for this stuff anyway? If this march is about helping women, why are you determined to make men the subject? “How many people eat at Joe’s every day?” is not the same question as “how many Joe’s employees feed people every day?”.
Funny she mentions the Indian rape laws because feminist groups shooting down the proposal to make rape gender neutral had a direct hand in LGBT being recriminalized. And you know, that hurt lesbians, bi women, and trans women too.
Yeah if rape laws aren’t gender neutral, shit like this can happen. Not to mention you’re hurting any victim of rape that isn’t m/f… INCLUDING f/f rape victims.
Mary Kay Letourneau, the Seattle elementary school teacher who was convicted of raping her sixth-grade student before she ultimately married him and had two daughters, said in a new interview she didn’t know the love affair was a crime.
“If someone had told me, if anyone had told me, there is a specific law that says this is a crime,” she said on “Sunday Night” on Australia’s Channel Seven. “I did not know. I’ve said this over and over again. Had I’d known, if anyone knows my personality. Just the idea, this would count as a crime.”
She also said she felt “absolutely” wrongfully convicted.
She added that although Vili Fualaau was 12 years old at the time, 22 years her junior, she claimed he “was the boss” and pursued her, as news.com.au reported
———-
Why do we let these sick fucks walk the streets again?
I’ll be fully honest, I think news reports like this contribute to it some. You always see words like “affair with a minor” and stuff. It puts out that wording and phrasing that is so slippery. You cannot “have an affair with a minor”, you cannot “hook-up with a minor”, none of that. It’s rape.
It definitely contributes, and it’s rarely refers to female perpetrators as the pedophiles they are.
Site Title 