🗣 I swear to God people get a high off of hanging people instead of working towards resolving conditioned behaviors. Your ego is getting high off of being a social justice agent but what change are you really making towards the human condition?
“Replicating bullshit is not the path to liberation.”
I’ve done it before. I used to be anti guns but after seeing people debunk their arguments I’ve fallen more in the middle but I don’t consider myself overtly pro guns.
If I find out my opinion is based on wrong things I’ll take the truth into consideration.
Ranma ½ was also made by a woman and it’s nothing but 38 volumes of boob jokes.
But dasha anything made by a woman is pure and perfect because women are sexless pure virginal beings!
Also 100% agree that boobs are freakin awesome.
She also made Inuyasha and honestly Rumiko Takahashi is a goddess. Her boob and pec game? STRONG. Thighs? GLORIOUS. Everyone was attractive in those universes. Rumiko knew what the world wanted and delivered.
Thank god Inuyasha came out in the 2000s. If it came out today I can guarantee people would call Rumiko Takahashi as having internalised misogyny or secretly a man or say shipping InuKag and/or InuKikyo makes you an abuser somehow. Or worse, say that because they’re 15 and 16 it makes you a pedo.
uh because they would’ve gotten their asses kicked by dragons and everyone flying on them would’ve fallen a thousand feet to their death and then the one ring would’ve been back in the bad dude’s hands because who the fuck misses HUGE ASS EAGLES trying to fly in occupied air space?? this was a covert mission, Henry, its a lot easier to sneak a bunch of three foot hobbits across miles of rocky mountain terrain than it is to cloak fucking ginormous do-good birds in the middle of empty-ass sky
There’s something really beautiful about your articulation in a way that many Tolkienites presenting the idea before just never managed to capture 😂🧡💙
How about we paint all the purple states black, hm?
… no
Adultery shouldn’t be a crime because, ultimately, it’s a matter of that person’s freedom. Freedom of association must logically extend to freedom to have whatever relationships you like. I absolutely believe that there should, in some circumstances, be the option for the wronged party to sue for emotional damages if circumstances are that severe, but unless I’m greatly mistaken, that is already allowed.
The fact that an action is immoral does not represent evidence that it should be illegal. In fact, morality and legality MUST be kept separate, for the sake of the stability of the nation and the society.
If fidelity was part of your wedding vows, then you can totally hook an adulterer on breach of contract.
But making the act itself illegal opens a lot of doors that should not be opened. You give the government permission to prosecute you and your partners for having a threesome. You make polyamorous relationships forbidden by law. You set a precedent for governmental control over any part of your sex life that deviates from the official legally mandated norm.
Don’t get me wrong, cheating on somebody you claim to love is an absolutely vile act. But there’s no law that prevents it without hurting a whole lot of bystanders.