The “friend zone” and unrequited love are not the same thing. Unrequited love is, “I love you, you don’t love me in that same way, I am sad about that.” The “friend zone” is, “I love you, you don’t love me in that same way, you have therefore wronged me.”
Unrequited love is, “My unilateral crush is my problem.” The “friend zone” is, “My unilateral crush is your problem.”
Again for the ones in the back
Louder.
I always thought the friendzone was when you have a crush on someone and then they say you are a good friend or something that basically means they just see you as a friend, thats what they see your relationship as. You are in the friendzone.
Yeah, that’s what I saw it as.
thats because that’s what it is. op is just splitting hairs.
yeah, the difference in what OP is talking about isn’t friendzone and something else, you’re friendzoned in both those cases, just in one you’re salty about it, in the other you aren’t.
The ‘zone is just a specific subtype of unrequited love. Oh, and it also includes passive rejection. But since it’s mostly men who are expected to take initiative, and for some reason they don’t like being rejected, SJWs turned it into misogynist sexism.
Because anything that might make a woman look even slightly bad is sexism.
Apparently.
Published
Site Title 