jlongbone:

michaelforworldchancellor:

jlongbone:

Problems with this

• The assumption that only cis straight men are lecherous
• The assumption that gay men are naturally lecherous
• The assumption that there’s something wrong with cis gay men objecting to being groped by gay men
• The assumption that cis straight men don’t practice consent

Problems with these problems:

– It doesn’t make this assumption.

– It doesn’t make this assumption. Even if it did, this claim contradicts the exclusivity of the previous claim: you can’t say that *only* cis straight men are being unfairly ridiculed and then say gay men are as well.

– It doesn’t make this assumption. Implying that a straight man would find unsolicited sexual attention from gay men undesirable doesn’t indicate that a gay man wouldn’t, either. The catch word remains “consent.”

– It doesn’t make this assumption. The fact that you (generally speaking) are not patted on head and assured that you’re one of the good guys doesn’t invalidate the image’s point or the timeliness of its expression.

• Yes it does
• Yes it does. You can denigrate two groups at the same time. Leave it to tumblr to fuck up a “positive message” that badly
• Yes it does. Holy shit I just realized my typo, I meant “cis straight men groped by gay men” my bad
• I’m a girl, dipshit